Docker Desktop vs Docker Machine

• Linux Containers: Parallels, LXC, OpenVZ, Docker And More ..
• Docker Vs Parallels
• Blursed WSL: Use WSL On Mac Via Parallels Desktop | Patrick ..
• M1 Virtualization: UTM Vs Parallels? | MacRumors Forums

1. Aug 02, 2021 That being said, Parallels Desktop 16 for Mac is an all-out performer which takes Windows experience on Mac devices to a whole new level- a level which VMware Fusion is highly unlikely to reach any time soon. # Here is a complete Parallels Desktop vs VMware Fusion features comparison from Parallels.
2. You will also get a brief idea how each product performs. As an example, on this page you can see Docker's overall score of 9.4 and compare it against Parallels RAS's score of 8.7; or Docker's user satisfaction level at 98% versus Parallels RAS's 100% satisfaction score.
3. I have a 2013 Mac Pro running the latest Parallels Desktop Pro v 12.2.0 (41591) On it, is a Windows 10 Pro virtual with Docker Version 17.03.1-ce-win10 (11972) Docker can only run with 'windows containers' because when trying to fire up the 'MobyLinux' instance in Hyper-V, it never fires up always bombing at: tsc: Fast TSC calibration failed I.

Nov 30, 2020 FAQs - Docker vs. Virtual Machines. Q: Are Docker Containers Faster Than VMware Virtual Machines? A: 'Containers are lighter-weight, and they offer definite performance advantages in certain areas, like startup time. Depending on the type of workload you are contending with; however, containers may not be significantly faster than virtual. Docker Engine accepts docker commands from the CLI, such as docker run, docker ps to list running containers,docker image ls to list images, and so on. Docker Machine is a tool for provisioning and managing your Dockerized hosts (hosts with Docker Engine on them). Typically, you install Docker Machine on your local system.

Play ninja saga game. Docker Containers

I've been reading about Docker for Mac recently, and realized that there was something I never quite understood – how does Docker run on the recent macOS versions without VirtualBox or Parallels that I remember it required just a few years ago.

Docker Machine

Linux Containers: Parallels, LXC, OpenVZ, Docker And More ..

This is the original implementation of Docker for macOS and Wndows. You have a special VM image (Docker Machine) that needs a third party virtualization solution like VirtualBox or Parallels to run.

VM image acts as a Docker host – it's a minimal Linux distro optimised for minimal footprint and best performance. You also have a set of command line utilities that you can run from your native OS – macOS, for instance – that talk to the Docker Machine for starting/stopping or otherwise managing Docker containers.

The way I understand it, you must expand RAM and vCPU allocation for the Docker Machine manually to provide more compute and memory resources for your Docker containers.

Docker Desktop

Docker Desktop is a different kind of solution. It doesn't need a third party virtualization because it depends on native OS virtualization methods. Will be interesting to research this for Windows, but for macOS these technologies are called Hypervisor Framework.

Docker Desktop spins up a kind of VM using HyperKit, which is an open-source solution for embedding Hypervisor virtualization into your app.

You don't need to manage this VM and have a nice interface for controlling how many virtual CPUs and RAM is allocated to that Docker instance.

Docker Vs Parallels

There's less overhead when it comes to managing Docker VM, but some functionality is limited by the OS implementation.

That's it for today! Will share more if/when I'm researching this topic again.

See Also

Docker Desktop

Docker Desktop is a different kind of solution. It doesn't need a third party virtualization because it depends on native OS virtualization methods. Will be interesting to research this for Windows, but for macOS these technologies are called Hypervisor Framework.

Docker Desktop spins up a kind of VM using HyperKit, which is an open-source solution for embedding Hypervisor virtualization into your app.

You don't need to manage this VM and have a nice interface for controlling how many virtual CPUs and RAM is allocated to that Docker instance.

Docker Vs Parallels

There's less overhead when it comes to managing Docker VM, but some functionality is limited by the OS implementation.

That's it for today! Will share more if/when I'm researching this topic again.

See Also

Blursed WSL: Use WSL On Mac Via Parallels Desktop | Patrick ..

• How To Tag Docker Images
• Migrating Docker Containers
• List All Docker Contianers
• Install Docker on Mac

M1 Virtualization: UTM Vs Parallels? | MacRumors Forums